🔗 Share this article

Just two days before the NYC race for mayor, political analyst Michael Lange issued a significant electoral prediction – going beyond who would win overall, and precinct by precinct. The analyst, an expert in elections who grew up in the city, devoted more than ten years in progressive politics and emerged as something of a local celebrity recently for his thorough analyses into city data and voter surveys.

He published his extremely precise prediction map – accurately predicting that the progressive candidate would win while failed to predict the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his newsletter, the Narrative War. He has a flair for clever terms. He pointed out, for instance, the divide between the progressive stronghold, running from one neighborhood to another area to a third locale, where he forecasted (accurately) that Mamdani would win by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, certain media outlets and financial newspapers surpass the New York Times” in readership and the majority of electors leaned toward the independent, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.

Voting Day Trends and Unexpected Results

What was your election night?

It was necessary because they were dropping around 200,000 ballots into the tally frequently! I felt somewhat anxious initially: The candidate was ahead the early vote by 12 points, but there were two big batches of ballots that came in later and the advantage dropped from 12% to 8%. It was concerning.

You know, it was possible in which election day turned out somewhat badly for Mamdani, in which Cuomo was going to end up basically doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. But the winner gained half a million votes to his primary coalition, and this was critical why he won. He campaigned and massively expanded his base from the primary.

Expanding Support

Where did the mayor-elect get those extra votes from?

He built the alliance that progressives long aimed for: diverse racially, it’s young, tenants and it’s people facing cost pressures. He improved considerably with Black and Hispanic voters, working- and middle-class voters, relative to the earlier election. Plus he boosted his core of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and Muslims and south Asians. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He created the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: multiracial, youthful, tenants and residents squeezed by affordability

There were also some Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a real thing, confined to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Islamic voters. Electors in ethnic enclaves that went for Trump last year went for the progressive now. But it’s not that he was winning over white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.

Voter Participation and Impact

One of the big stories of the election was the sky-high turnout. Who benefited?

Both sides. Participation was significantly higher than anticipated. I figured we might go over 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – which is a lot of darn voters. There was a decent anti-Mamdani block, energized, but the Mamdani base was also motivated, and that was enough to secure victory.

You forecasted he’d exceed 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Right now you would say he’s likely to get over half. He’s at just over 50% but remain probably 200,000 votes left to report as of Wednesday morning. So I don’t think it’s definitive, but I think it’s likely, and I wish he does because then no one can say the Republican was a spoiler.

Republican Collapse

The GOP candidate, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His support plummeted.

He lost a single precinct in any area. Not even Tottenville in Staten Island, similar to an highly conservative neighborhood. That truly was unexpected. Cuomo held very white areas, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and then added many conservatives on Staten Island with a strong turnout. I believe occurred significant strategic balloting by GOP voters. They were doing it before the former president tweeted his support for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide if Mamdani’s coalition failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your much mentioned left-wing base – did backing for Mamdani dominant in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think there was some weakening of the progressive zone in some areas like Astoria or Greenpoint that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, for example, the property owners and homeowners supported the independent. Thus there existed a little resistance. But no, mostly the commie corridor is a key factor why Mamdani won – he was polling between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

In the lead-up to the vote we reported on if Mamdani was gaining ground with Jewish New Yorkers. Is there any suggestion that he succeeded?

Exist areas with a lot of secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as specific locales – where he performed strongly. However in the affluent districts such as the Upper East Side, his Middle East stance definitely mattered there. Similarly in the moderate communities like Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned the independent. And also, you have newcomers from the former Soviet Union in the borough, who were strongly supportive. Therefore I don’t know if there were major surprises here, but Mamdani retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and including sections of the another locale with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Has Mamdani rewritten what the city represents in politics? Will the progressive base serve as a springboard for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest political leaders from progressives come from a few areas in the boroughs. I believe that we’ll see more of that – candidates will come from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

But I think that each urban center in the US could develop similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the epicenters of leftwing power in the nation – because youth reside there, tenancy is common and they represent locales where individuals struggle by the disparities exist.